Consulting

Know why
before you decide.

Validated psychological measurement applied to organizational performance. Not surveys for the sake of surveys — signal that informs decisions.

Start a Conversation →
PhD, Cognitive Psychology · University of Pittsburgh · EMA Methodology · Shiffman Lab · GLM · SAS · SPSS · R · Python · Founder, Digital Performance Measurement Platform

Three Offerings

Precision for every context

Each engagement starts with a qualifying conversation — not a pitch. The right offering depends on what you need to know, who you can reach, and what you'll do with the data.

01

Problem Diagnosis

One unit underperforms relative to peers. You need to know exactly why — with numbers, not intuition. A comparative diagnostic that quantifies gaps across validated constructs and yields 3–5 actionable recommendations. Typical engagement: 2–4 weeks.

Self-Efficacy Role Clarity Relationship Quality Inclusion Positivity
02

Team Alignment

Process frameworks don't fix belief problems. This works at the level of identity, mission, and shared mental models — with a baseline measure, co-developed outputs, and a follow-up loop that quantifies what actually changed.

Mission Clarity Role Certainty Shared Vision Longitudinal
03

Organizational Insight Gathering

Large, distributed populations. Real questions about culture, alignment, or experience. Structured surveys designed to minimize burden and maximize signal — producing defensible benchmarks from populations that traditional feedback mechanisms can't reach honestly.

Culture Audit Structured Survey Scale Instruments Benchmarking

The Method

Grounded in published science, built for real organizations

01

Scope & Qualify

A short qualifying conversation confirms fit and routes to the right offering — or redirects if the problem calls for something else.

02

Construct Selection

Validated instruments from the organizational behavior and cognitive psychology literature are identified and adapted. No ad hoc surveys.

03

Survey Delivery

Short, structured surveys delivered via web or email over 2–6 weeks. Designed for brevity and clarity — drawing on ecological research principles to reduce recall bias and capture responses closer to real experience.

04

Analysis & Report

Quantitative effect sizes paired with qualitative thematic synthesis. GLM-tradition statistical analysis. Plain-language findings with ranked, actionable recommendations.

"Leaders often know that something is wrong — but not why. Intuition, anecdote, and gut reads dominate. Interventions miss the root cause, or fix symptoms while the underlying dynamic persists."

Core Problem This Work Addresses

Representative Work

What the data has found

Problem Diagnosis

Multi-Site Performance Gap

3-week rolling diagnostic across frontline staff at two sites. Quantified gaps in expectation-meeting, relationship quality, self-efficacy, and belongingness. Informed onboarding and support structure changes.

7–23% construct gap range quantified

Team Alignment

Sales Team Mission & Vision

Multi-loop engagement producing co-developed mission, vision, and value proposition. Follow-up loop measured real change in confidence, certainty, and ambiguity.

+12% confidence · −7% role ambiguity

Organizational Insight Gathering

Regional Inclusion Benchmarks

Three-month study across a professional network. Inclusivity positively correlated with positivity and self-efficacy. Established reusable regional benchmarks.

79 participants across 20+ organizations

Organizational Insight Gathering

CRM Adoption Alignment

Large-scale program surfacing perceptions of CRM purpose and adoption barriers across a global sales organization before a major alignment meeting.

195 users aligned pre-launch

Organizational Insight Gathering

Multi-Site Longitudinal Engagement

90-day longitudinal program tracking participation and engagement across organizational levels and locations. Multi-group design with replicable instrumentation.

90-day longitudinal design

Team Alignment

Executive Peer Cohort Insight

Open-ended peer learning program surfacing practices, obstacles, and perspectives across founders and executives. Qualitative synthesis for cohort development design.

13 CEOs and founders

Start Here

A short conversation to find the right fit

Every engagement starts with a qualifying conversation — not a pitch. If the problem fits, we'll scope it. If it doesn't, you'll leave with a clearer frame regardless.